💭 Motion Statistics
Round 1

As the Indonesian government, This House would require regional football clubs to only sign players who were born in that region. * For example, Persija can only recruit people who were born within the DKI Jakarta region, etc. (sports)

Government 1.34
Opposition 1.66
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.19
Closing 1.81
Average Points per half
0.94
1.44
1.75
1.88
average points per position (16 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
Round 2

As the Indonesian Film Industry, This House would focus on investing in Local Art House Films rather than Blockbuster films (art and media)

View Info Slide
Government 1.59
Opposition 1.41
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.63
Closing 1.38
Average Points per half
1.56
1.69
1.63
1.13
average points per position (16 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
Round 3

This House believes that the incorporation of Western-centric concepts in Indonesian social justice discourse has done more harm than good. * Examples of Western-centric concepts in social justice discourse include but not limited to the concept of ""privilege"", ""choice feminism"", ""wokeness"", etc." (social justice)

Government 1.19
Opposition 1.81
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.63
Closing 1.38
Average Points per half
1.38
1.88
1.00
1.75
average points per position (16 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
Round 4

This House regrets the glorification of networking as a means to build professional credentials (work!)

Government 1.19
Opposition 1.81
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.66
Closing 1.34
Average Points per half
1.25
2.06
1.13
1.56
average points per position (16 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
Round 5

This House opposes the use of predictive recidivism models in deciding penalties (criminal justice)

View Info Slide
Government 1.56
Opposition 1.44
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.63
Closing 1.38
Average Points per half
1.69
1.56
1.44
1.31
average points per position (16 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
Round 6

This House prefers a world in which human beings believe that life has no inherent meaning (philosophy)

Government 1.43
Opposition 1.57
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.57
Closing 1.43
Average Points per half
1.13
2.00
1.73
1.13
average points per position (15 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
results
Quarterfinals

This House believes that Russo-Ukrainian War should be depicted as a tragedy rather than a fight between good and evil (IR)

results from 4 debates
advanced
eliminated
results distribution
advanced
eliminated
results distribution
advanced
eliminated
results distribution
advanced
eliminated
results distribution
Semifinals

This House opposes the prevalent usage of Social Return on Investment (SROI) as a measurement of the success rate of development projects (development)

View Info Slide
results from 2 debates
advanced
elim.
results distribution
adv.
eliminated
results distribution
advanced
eliminated
results distribution
advanced
eliminated
results distribution
Grand Final

This House believes that the prevalence of "mikul dhuwur mendhem jero" has bring more harm than good (mikul dhuwur mendhem jero)

View Info Slide
results from 1 debate
adv.
eliminated
results distribution
adv.
eliminated
results distribution
advanced
elim.
results distribution
adv.
eliminated
results distribution